in Web

Genericise

…or, as I would define it, ‘to make more generic; to turn from a specific into a generic case’. I knew that this wonderful word that I have been dropping into emails and documents at work for many years doesn’t exist in the standard Microsoft dictionary. Recently, after it had been highlighted for the umpteenth time in Outlook, I finally looked it up. To my horror, I found that it doesn’t exist.

Except that it does. Some wonderful individuals have come to my rescue with a dictionary to which we can all submit words – the wonderful Pseudodictionary. I’m not sure who Phil T is, but he’s a man after my own heart.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)

  1. I think that language should be defined by what people use, not by what’s in a dictionary. If a word starts being used and is understood by many people, then I think the word exists even if nobody has managed to put it into a dictionary yet.