{"id":8273,"date":"2021-11-19T07:42:34","date_gmt":"2021-11-19T07:42:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/andrewdoran.uk\/blog\/?p=8273"},"modified":"2021-11-19T23:33:23","modified_gmt":"2021-11-19T23:33:23","slug":"enabling-everyone-in-hybrid-meetings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/andrewdoran.uk\/blog\/2021\/11\/19\/enabling-everyone-in-hybrid-meetings\/","title":{"rendered":"Enabling everyone in hybrid meetings"},"content":{"rendered":"
On Wednesday I attended a long workshop from home. A few of us were dialled in via BlueJeans<\/a>, while the vast majority of attendees were physically present in the room. It struck me that being a remote participant must be a teeny tiny bit like having a disability; it was difficult to hear, difficult to see and I had to work extra hard to participate. We spent a significant amount of time staring at an empty lectern, hearing voices fade in and out but not seeing anyone on screen.<\/p>\n

There’s a big push to ‘crack hybrid’. I know that the technology will inevitably improve to make these meetings better, reducing the friction between being in the room and out of it. But for now, if the meeting is a workshop, or just the kind where you want to democratise participation and involve everyone (as opposed to talking at them webinar or lecture style), then it makes sense to me to have everyone join in the same way<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Elizabeth Stokoe puts it better than me:<\/p>\n

\n

10. This is why hybrid models generate problems. Having half of a meeting\u2019s participants dial in while the rest are co-present around one camera+screen+microphone generates the worst of all worlds because the participants have unequal access to the resources we use to interact.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Elizabeth Stokoe (@LizStokoe) August 11, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n